There
exists only one plot in all of fiction: A Hero Goes on a Journey . .
. or . . . A Stranger Comes to Town. The difference between them is
the protagonist’s point of view.
A
good place to start yours is by utilizing the tried and true classic
Quest: an object to obtain and limited time to obtain it.
Star
Wars: A New Hope
Object
to obtain: Darth Vader is after the stolen plans,
Limited
time: before the rebels can use them to exploit the Death Star’s
design flaw.
The
Matrix
Object
to obtain: Agent Smith is after Zion’s access codes,
Limited
time: before the rebels can catalyze The One prophesied to free
humanity.
The
Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
Object
to obtain: Sauron is after the One Ring,
Limited
time: before Frodo and his fellows can destroy it in the fires of
Mount Doom.
You
see, most villains are after the same thing: Power.
In
other words to expand and/or complete their dominance over others
through tyranny and oppression.
If
they already control a village then they seek to rule the whole
region; if they already control a state then they seek to rule the
whole country; if they already control a continent then they seek to
rule the whole world; if they already control a galaxy then they seek
to rule the whole universe . . . etc.
But
then the unanticipated happens because of some form of ‘rebel
alliance’ representing liberty and freedom who attempts to thwart
them, which the missing-piece protagonist usually isn’t a part of
at the beginning though joins to take up the shared cause and
eventually becomes its foremost true-believer champion.
So
the villain’s focus shifts to removing the rebel alliance in order
to finish their stalled plans . . . which never works out when you
throw a triumphant protagonist monkey-wrench into the cogs.
Star
Wars: A New Hope
Darth
Vader wants to eradicate the rebels and finish the Death Star to
ensure the Empire’s galactic dominance.
The
Matrix
Agent
Smith wants to eradicate the rebels and ensure full control over the
matrix simulation enslaving all remaining humans.
The
Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
Sauron
wants to eradicate the fellowship ‘rebels’ and ensure his
world-dominating power via the One Ring.
When
beginning your story from scratch, the two most important plot points
are:
1.
The Act 1 Key Event
2.
The Act 3 Climax
An
Inciting Incident has four main requirements: 1. it must happen to
the protagonist, 2. it must present their first (not full) awareness
of the story’s central conflict, 3. it must be tailored to their
dominant character flaw, and 4. it must be linked to the antagonist.
The
difference between the Inciting Incident and the proceeding Key Event
is that the Key Event is what locks in the protagonist to the story’s
central conflict, either by choice or by force, but most importantly
it also presents your story’s dramatic question that the Act 3
Climax will eventually answer with either a resounding Yes
(triumphant protagonist) or a resounding No (tragic protagonist).
This
all-important dramatic question establishes the protagonist’s main
objective for the rest of the story that is Act 2 and beyond, and it
is one of three things which they will seek to achieve:
1.
Possession of something
2.
Relief from something
3.
Revenge for something
To
simplify, Act 1 exists to present the story’s dramatic question,
Act 2 exists to debate the story’s dramatic question, and Act 3
exists to answer the story’s dramatic question.
You
should never open your story with backstory because if the backstory
is so damn important then it wouldn’t be backstory, it would be the
story.
So
where to place it instead?
What
happens between Act 1’s Inciting Incident and Key Event is
something special because that’s where the protagonist is
trickle-fed more relevant information about the story’s central
conflict, and it’s interwoven with the first real brunt of
backstory, thus killing two birds with one stone.
Star
Wars: A New Hope
Between
Luke accidentally triggering the holographic message (Inciting
Incident) and finding his aunt and uncle dead (Key Event), Obi-Wan
saves him from the sand people then they have a revealing
conversation providing more of the story’s central conflict while
interweaving it with plenty of Anakin and Empire backstory.
The
Matrix
Between
Neo meeting Trinity at the club (Inciting Incident) and taking the
red pill (Key Event), Neo learns why the agents are after him
courtesy of his interrogation and how they intend to use him to get
to Morpheus courtesy of the bug implant removed from his stomach on
the way to meeting Morpheus.
The
Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
Between
Frodo witnessing Bilbo inexplicably vanishing during the big birthday
bash (Inciting Incident) and leaving the Shire with the One Ring as
its temporary ring-bearer (Key Event), Frodo learns more about the
One Ring’s history and why it’s so desired by evil forces
courtesy of Gandalf.
Instead,
open your story by establishing protagonist empathy before the
Inciting Incident, otherwise we won’t care. It’s easy to do by
using Save the Cat and Kick the Dog scenes (in any number and
sequence thereof).
Save
the Cat is just a metaphor for showing your protagonist doing
something admirable (not necessarily virtuous) to establish
likeability. And Kick the Dog is another metaphor showing your
protagonist suffering an undeserved misfortune to establish sympathy.
This
combination of events is crucial because: Likeability + Sympathy =
Empathy.
Also
show the flawed protagonist’s three slices of life: home, work, and
play (social) to establish relatability. This gives us a glimpse of
what is most important to them during their everyday life of enabling
circumstances before the Inciting Incident comes along to challenge
those enabling circumstances—which is what all Inciting Incidents
must do.
Because
the enabling circumstances is what allows the protagonist’s
dominant character flaw to fester unchallenged, and without the
Inciting Incident it would remain unchallenged. But more importantly
their dominant character flaw is what your story is really all about
when everything else of lesser value is stripped away since every
story is about one thing above all else: protagonist change, whether
positive (triumphant) or negative (tragic).
So
what’s the difference between them?
First,
know that if you have a triumphant protagonist then you automatically
have a tragic antagonist (and vice versa).
Secondly,
understand that every protagonist has two antagonists: Internal and
External.
The
internal antagonist is the protagonist’s dominant character flaw
they begin their story afflicted with.
The
external antagonist is the ‘villain’ whom is the physical
manifestation of the protagonist’s dominant character flaw.
So
in essence you have two climaxes, the internal antagonist Rubicon
confrontation at the end of Act 2B, and the well-known external
antagonist Climax confrontation at the end of Act 3. This is
extremely important because what happens during the Act 2 Rubicon
climax determines what happens during the Act 3 Climax.
A
triumphant protagonist eventually confronts the internal antagonist
during the Rubicon and overcomes their dominant character flaw by
embracing its opposite virtue, and this is what empowers them to win
against the external antagonist as their reward during the Act 3
Climax because they become the physical manifestation of the virtue.
A
tragic protagonist eventually confronts the internal antagonist
during the Rubicon and surrenders to their dominant character flaw by
rejecting its opposite virtue, and this is what condemns them to lose
as punishment during the Act 3 Climax.
And
here is where the two protagonists differ the most, because a tragic
protagonist becomes the physical manifestation of their dominant
character flaw during the Rubicon but the antagonist already exists,
so the protagonist must replace the old antagonist (either directly
or indirectly) to become the new antagonist then battle the physical
manifestation of the virtue character and lose as punishment.
The
Rubicon is so damn important because the Act 3 Climax it determines
must be the physical manifestation of the virtue character vs. the
physical manifestation of the flaw character.
With
a triumphant protagonist you already have that outcome as an
inevitability, but with a tragic protagonist it becomes a slight more
complicated because you cannot have two antagonists in the same story
so one must replace the other (I call this the ‘antagonist
replacement theory’ to sound like I’m smart).
You
also must replace the former protagonist with a new protagonist who
embodies the virtue now that the new antagonist embodies the flaw (I
call this the ‘protagonist replacement theory’ to sound like I’m
even smarter).
For
example, in Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith, General Grievous is the
antagonist (one of many secondary puppet-antagonists to Palpatine,
yes, but consider them the Saruman & Sauron pairing here since
Star Wars isn’t a standalone story but a series in which Palpatine
gets his comeuppance later on), and Obi-Wan kills Grievous during the
Midpoint at the same time Anakin aids Palpatine against Mace Windu to
become Darth Vader, thus the old antagonist (Grievous) is replaced
with the new antagonist (Anakin).
This
then leads to the Climax where the new physical manifestation of the
flaw replacement-antagonist (Anakin) battles it out with the new
physical manifestation of the virtue replacement-protagonist
(Obi-Wan) and is punished with defeat for his Rubicon decision of
surrendering to his dominant character flaw.
Do
you see now why tragic protagonists are that much harder to write and
should only be tackled by experienced authors?
For
this same reason it’s also much harder to plot out a trilogy than a
standalone novel. For example, The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship
of the Ring.
The
Midpoint of the Fellowship story by itself is the Council of Elrond
in Rivendell when Frodo interrupts all of the arguing with his
declaration that he will take the One Ring to Mordor . . . though he
does not know the way. But for the overall trilogy, the Council of
Elrond is not the Midpoint but the Act 1 Key Event.
See
the problem?
If
you do not have a firm grasp on plot, trying to map out an entire
trilogy as well each of its individual books will lead only to
confusion because the plot points won’t match up while getting all
jumbled in your head.
Even
established authors have a hard time writing trilogies—let alone an
entire series of novels—because of this, which is why most of them
don’t bother.
That’s
why it is well-advised, at least for your first several novels, to
plan them as standalones.
*A
quick bit of explanation on the whole ‘physical manifestation’
term . . . take the movie Jaws as a perfect example. The man-eating
great white shark antagonist is the physical manifestation of
protagonist Brody’s dominant character flaw of aquaphobia (fear of
open water). Brody must overcome his aquaphobia in order to kill the
shark in the middle of the ocean during the Act 3 Climax.
(to be continued . . .)